![]() |
A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - Printable Version +- Kiwike forums (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum) +-- Forum: Community (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Bin (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27) +---- Forum: Kiwike: Revamped (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +----- Forum: Support (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=55) +------ Forum: Suggestions (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=61) +------ Thread: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray (/showthread.php?tid=2646) |
A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - guthriearmstrong - 03-08-2012 http://forums.bukkit.org/threads/sec-orebfuscator-1-3-10-anti-x-ray-1-1-r6.38385/page-39#post-1007619 It basically trolls x-rayers by turning ALL blocks into ore blocks or chests when an xray texture pack or mod is used. This would help with our bug of xrayers finding things that aren't totally covered. RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - andy66252 - 03-08-2012 troll level=God RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - DjFuzz - 03-08-2012 We have looked onto this plugin many times, And we would use it if thereveasnt the one problem, Lag. This puts large stress on the server and using it on the current server with a large amount of player that we will get when revamped is here, it would show ore books and chests everywhere so the option would be to upgrade the server that we need money for RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - geckosquid - 03-08-2012 (03-08-2012, 09:16)DjFuzz Wrote: thereveasntUm... Quite. RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - DjFuzz - 03-08-2012 (03-08-2012, 09:46)geckosquid Wrote:(03-08-2012, 09:16)DjFuzz Wrote: thereveasntUm... Quite. That is why you dont by apple iPods, damn autocorrect thing RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - pavja2 - 03-08-2012 I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change. RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - iDieForEXP - 03-08-2012 (03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change. I really like what spout does, but it adds insane lag for me. RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - DjFuzz - 03-08-2012 (03-08-2012, 10:02)iDieForEXP Wrote:(03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change. Yes I agree, The Features are great, but the lag unbearable. Normal minecraft I get around 230-300 FPS and on spout I get a very unstable 50 FPS or lower. But I guess with the new SMP api may have some ways of eliminating unwanted mods RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - partyars - 03-08-2012 (03-08-2012, 10:09)DjFuzz Wrote:(03-08-2012, 10:02)iDieForEXP Wrote:(03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change. Or maybe it's because you have a crappy computer. ![]() RE: A New Kind of Anti X-Ray - DjFuzz - 03-08-2012 (03-08-2012, 10:17)partyars Wrote:(03-08-2012, 10:09)DjFuzz Wrote:(03-08-2012, 10:02)iDieForEXP Wrote:(03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change. Well maybe ponys suck also |