+- Kiwike forums (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum)
+-- Forum: Community (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Bin (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27)
+---- Forum: Kiwike 2.0 archives (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+----- Forum: Nations (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+------ Forum: Republic of Helvanthar (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+------- Forum: House of Commerce (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=46)
+------- Thread: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits (/showthread.php?tid=2028)
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Cell - 10-20-2011
We can edit them for wars if needed. But 72 hours is three days, im aware.
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - skote11 - 10-20-2011
i vote for the first part of the bill but mabye a 24 hour limit per bill would be best? because why stunt such good ideas so greatly cell
?
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Crashlander04 - 10-20-2011
Bill 9.1 Modification/Proposal - What if we were to make 2 different categories? Quick-bills, and Full-bills - you'd need consent from Android to post a quick-bill which would be decided upon within 12-24 hours, while full-bills would be regular, no rush, "everybody take your times deciding" bills with a 72 hour waiting period.
And the quick-bills would need no set time limit between postings as they are direct permissions from Android so he could control the amount as he wishes.
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - skote11 - 10-20-2011
good idea sir a very good idea
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Cell - 10-20-2011
The point of this is so that Android is not as involved as much. As bad as that sounds, if android where to go away for a week, what would we do bill wise? We not need rely on a person. Therefore you modification has been declined.
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Crashlander04 - 10-21-2011
So instead of depending on one sure-fire person for quick-bills, you'd rather depend on nobody, never have the option, and never get anything done in less than three days? Android, help a brother out here.
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Spammuff - 10-21-2011
No, were good, let him burn.... :3
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Android - 10-21-2011
Mind as well have the idea of 'quick' bills rather than nothing, no? Although they'd be limited if I can't get to the computer or something like that, 'long' bills will always be there.
What do you say Cellular?
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Cell - 10-21-2011
The problem is, if no one can catch you online for days at a time due to them not being on when you are, and they have an amazing idea for a bill, they can't present it until they finally get a hold of you.
And what exactly would be the point of quick bills, other than to have them finish up in 24 hours instead of 72 hours?
RE: Bill 9.0 - Commerce Proposal Limits - Android - 10-21-2011
(10-21-2011, 01:59)Cell Wrote: The problem is, if no one can catch you online for days at a time due to them not being on when you are, and they have an amazing idea for a bill, they can't present it until they finally get a hold of you.
And what exactly would be the point of quick bills, other than to have them finish up in 24 hours instead of 72 hours?
I suppose we'd have to have criteria as to describe what a quick bill would entail.
Unless it varies a lot from what a normal bill would be, maybe we'd benefit in not having such things.