+- Kiwike forums (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum)
+-- Forum: Community (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Bin (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27)
+---- Forum: Kiwike: Revamped (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+----- Forum: Support (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+------ Forum: Ban Appeals/Requests (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+------ Thread: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co (/showthread.php?tid=3388)
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - geckosquid - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 18:55)Crashlander04 Wrote:(06-03-2012, 18:46)smellityet Wrote:(06-03-2012, 18:45)geckosquid Wrote: Well, reading all of that certainly took a huge chunk out of my day. 7 pages in one night? Wow. Anyways, I have a solution to all of this. It's what we over here in California call a compromise, because nobody here seems willing to shift their position in the slightest. We ban Solitude from raiding until Age 3. They can only defend themselves until that time. Then, we'll have an epic Age 3 war and everyone will be prepared and have fun with it. All right?
Gecko, you're the best!
I put my vote on this compromise.
I vote for this compromise.
Love you guys. <3
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Pwol - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 18:54)geckosquid Wrote:(06-03-2012, 18:51)NLewis Wrote:(06-03-2012, 18:45)geckosquid Wrote: Well, reading all of that certainly took a huge chunk out of my day. 7 pages in one night? Wow. Anyways, I have a solution to all of this. It's what we over here in California call a compromise, because nobody here seems willing to shift their position in the slightest. We ban Solitude from raiding until Age 3. They can only defend themselves until that time. Then, we'll have an epic Age 3 war and everyone will be prepared and have fun with it. All right?
I do not think this is a fair option. This is not a compromise, they will be able to attack us and take our items, but we will not be able to go into their towns and seek redemption? Gecko, how is this fair? We have RP reason for everything we have done. They just do not want to fight back.
This is not fair to us.
You speak of this as if they'll be able to kill you. And trust me, their raids would be very infrequent. You'll still be able to kill them and take their items, just within your own town.
However, if this compromise is passed gecko, the server will be able to team up and beat our defenses. As a result they will pick our chests and whatnot and steal our items. If we cannot fight back then they basically win. Not very fair at all. If you are going to ban our raiding on other towns, then ban them from attacking us, that way everything is fair.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Cell - 06-03-2012
Only problem is Gecko, will they abide by it?
They had, or have the restriction on them with raiding already, yet they broke that how many times? I doubt they would abide by this, which is a lot more restricting than what they have/had.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - smellityet - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 18:51)NLewis Wrote:It's quite fair. We won't be likely to attack you very often because, like you said, we just do "not want to fight back."(06-03-2012, 18:45)geckosquid Wrote: Well, reading all of that certainly took a huge chunk out of my day. 7 pages in one night? Wow. Anyways, I have a solution to all of this. It's what we over here in California call a compromise, because nobody here seems willing to shift their position in the slightest. We ban Solitude from raiding until Age 3. They can only defend themselves until that time. Then, we'll have an epic Age 3 war and everyone will be prepared and have fun with it. All right?
I do not think this is a fair option. This is not a compromise, they will be able to attack us and take our items, but we will not be able to go into their towns and seek redemption? Gecko, how is this fair? We have RP reason for everything we have done. They just do not want to fight back.
This is not fair to us.
---------------------
There's RP reasoning for this:
All the families of your "civilization" (since you don't consider yourself a barbarian) are pretty mad at you for killing off all their sons from so many wars. The best thing to do is allow them some time to recover their losses and take a little time to develop more culture. It would be a shame if your people revolted, my Lord.
Unless you can come up with a more reasonable RP reason, this is pretty true. You cannot say that all of your families are power-hungry (you said you aren't barbarians!) without powergaming. Other countries have a larger population, so they can decide with actual people. But that's beside the point.
Roleplaying is about filling in the cracks (like melons = berries; redstone torch = wine; paving roads = group of NPC laborers) to make the game the most realistic it can be.
This isn't supposed to be the playground where you bully other people after your long day of doing whatever you do. It's about having fun.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - NLewis - 06-03-2012
We have all spoken.
We accept the compromise to not raid.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - geckosquid - 06-03-2012
Pwol is right. Nobody can attack Solitude, and Solitude cannot attack anyone else. This expires once Age III begins.
Cell, it's really simple; if Solitude attacks anyone, it's a ban. If anyone attacks Solitude, it's a ban.
This can be disguised as a ceasefire treaty, by the way.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - NLewis - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 19:04)geckosquid Wrote: Pwol is right. Nobody can attack Solitude, and Solitude cannot attack anyone else. This expires once Age III begins.
Cell, it's really simple; if Solitude attacks anyone, it's a ban. If anyone attacks Solitude, it's a ban.
This can be disguised as a ceasefire treaty, by the way.
Sounds good to us.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - geckosquid - 06-03-2012
I'll talk with the staff and make this official. I'm glad we could sort this out.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Riskae - 06-03-2012
No,that's bullshit, they already were banned from raiding an continued to do so anyway. They should be banned.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - smellityet - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 19:05)NLewis Wrote: Sounds good to us.Yaaaay!
