+- Kiwike forums (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum)
+-- Forum: Community (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Bin (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27)
+---- Forum: Kiwike: Revamped (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+----- Forum: Support (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+------ Forum: Ban Appeals/Requests (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+------ Thread: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co (/showthread.php?tid=3388)
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - geckosquid - 06-03-2012
All citizens of Solitude are restricted.
And Cell, do you have any idea how many complaints we'd get if everyone was banned from raiding?
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Crashlander04 - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 19:58)geckosquid Wrote: All citizens of Solitude are restricted.
And Cell, do you have any idea how many complaints we'd get if everyone was banned from raiding?
What if a derpy member acts on his own behalf?
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Cell - 06-03-2012
I do. Thats why I suggest you come up with another comprimise that is fair.
Heck I think its ridiculous that you should even have to come up with something that farfetched, if its that badly required, should they just be banned.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Riskae - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 20:01)Cell Wrote: I do. Thats why I suggest you come up with another comprimise that is fair.
Heck I think its ridiculous that you should even have to come up with something that farfetched, if its that badly required, should they just be banned.
I completely agree with you cell.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - NLewis - 06-03-2012
I do not understand the logic in this thread.
The point of this thread was to get us ban because we were raiding you guys too much. We have agreed to a comprimise which stops us from raiding and stops you from raiding us so it is not unfair. But now, you want us ban because this is farfetched and it is unfair to You?
Please explain what you want to happen Cell? What do you want?
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Riskae - 06-03-2012
They still broke many many rules and deserved to be banned for it. They have gotten way too many second chances. Raiding be damned they are just shitty players which we don't need on this server.
They continued to raid despite the previous limit they were given and weren't punished, just like how they would be if you did it again. They haven't and will not learn there lesson they absolutely deserve a permaban.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - geckosquid - 06-03-2012
Cell, suggest another compromise if you have one.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Cell - 06-03-2012
I suggested something better than a compromise Gecko. If you really have to go that far to try to keep them in the server without having others quit, then something far more should be done.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Riskae - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 20:09)NLewis Wrote: I do not understand the logic in this thread.
The point of this thread was to get us ban because we were raiding you guys too much. We have agreed to a comprimise which stops us from raiding and stops you from raiding us so it is not unfair. But now, you want us ban because this is farfetched and it is unfair to You?
Please explain what you want to happen Cell? What do you want?
Did you even read the first post in this thread! The point of this thread is to have you banned because of all the rules you have broken and for being an absolute asshole since 2.0 and even before that.
(06-03-2012, 20:11)geckosquid Wrote: Cell, suggest another compromise if you have one.
Ban them.
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - Crashlander04 - 06-03-2012
I feel like the whole point of this thread has degenerated into 'We don't want them here - here are reasons that will help get them banned.'
Requesting lock - dumb thread.