Kiwike forums
Stronghold Instances - Printable Version

+- Kiwike forums (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum)
+-- Forum: Community (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Bin (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27)
+---- Forum: New Kiwike (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=82)
+----- Forum: Support (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=85)
+------ Forum: Suggestions (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=86)
+------ Thread: Stronghold Instances (/showthread.php?tid=4025)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

RE: Stronghold Instances - geckosquid - 10-30-2012

(10-29-2012, 23:44)Android Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:38)Crashlander04 Wrote: Actually, isn't even flame - I was correcting grammar and ZupZup was making a joke Tongue

Certainly, but not all people enjoy being called a dick and having their grammar corrected all in one post. I for one would go ballistic.

It's 'I, for one, would...', you dick.

RE: Stronghold Instances - bvcxzmn - 10-30-2012

XD, Gecko makes a very good point!

RE: Stronghold Instances - Android - 10-30-2012

(10-30-2012, 05:16)geckosquid Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:44)Android Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:38)Crashlander04 Wrote: Actually, isn't even flame - I was correcting grammar and ZupZup was making a joke Tongue

Certainly, but not all people enjoy being called a dick and having their grammar corrected all in one post. I for one would go ballistic.

It's 'I, for one, would...', you dick.

[Image: 250px-Trident_II_missile_image.jpg]

RE: Stronghold Instances - Crashlander04 - 10-30-2012

(10-30-2012, 18:01)Android Wrote:
(10-30-2012, 05:16)geckosquid Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:44)Android Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:38)Crashlander04 Wrote: Actually, isn't even flame - I was correcting grammar and ZupZup was making a joke Tongue

Certainly, but not all people enjoy being called a dick and having their grammar corrected all in one post. I for one would go ballistic.

It's 'I, for one, would...', you dick.

[Image: 250px-Trident_II_missile_image.jpg]

I'm actually crying of laughter.

And I was inquiring about whether or not he was trying to dismiss my point as irrelevant - I never actually called him a dick.

RE: Stronghold Instances - Android - 10-30-2012

(10-30-2012, 21:33)Crashlander04 Wrote:
(10-30-2012, 18:01)Android Wrote:
(10-30-2012, 05:16)geckosquid Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:44)Android Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:38)Crashlander04 Wrote: Actually, isn't even flame - I was correcting grammar and ZupZup was making a joke Tongue

Certainly, but not all people enjoy being called a dick and having their grammar corrected all in one post. I for one would go ballistic.

It's 'I, for one, would...', you dick.

[Image: 250px-Trident_II_missile_image.jpg]

I'm actually crying of laughter.

And I was inquiring about whether or not he was trying to dismiss my point as irrelevant - I never actually called him a dick.

I'm just rather proud of my word choice right now, to be honest.

RE: Stronghold Instances - sethd13 - 10-31-2012

(10-29-2012, 18:44)ZupZup Wrote: yotta could release the plugin so I could try it on my own server? Wink
Fuck that / Yao Ming
Yotta doesn't release anything, ever.
Not even nostalgia maps Okay


RE: Stronghold Instances - geckosquid - 10-31-2012

(get it? Droid went ballistic)

RE: Stronghold Instances - sethd13 - 10-31-2012

[Image: UxMEp.jpg]

RE: Stronghold Instances - yottabyte - 10-31-2012

(10-31-2012, 00:21)sethd13 Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 18:44)ZupZup Wrote: yotta could release the plugin so I could try it on my own server? Wink
Fuck that / Yao Ming
Yotta doesn't release anything, ever.
Not even nostalgia maps Okay

To be honest, I have considered releasing old maps but I doubt anyone would like to sit through a 12 GB download for that. Not to mention the bandwidth usage. No idea where to host that kind of stuff.

RE: Stronghold Instances - Crashlander04 - 10-31-2012

(10-30-2012, 23:31)Android Wrote:
(10-30-2012, 21:33)Crashlander04 Wrote:
(10-30-2012, 18:01)Android Wrote:
(10-30-2012, 05:16)geckosquid Wrote:
(10-29-2012, 23:44)Android Wrote: Certainly, but not all people enjoy being called a dick and having their grammar corrected all in one post. I for one would go ballistic.

It's 'I, for one, would...', you dick.

[Image: 250px-Trident_II_missile_image.jpg]

I'm actually crying of laughter.

And I was inquiring about whether or not he was trying to dismiss my point as irrelevant - I never actually called him a dick.

I'm just rather proud of my word choice right now, to be honest.

I am too. Yay for droid knowing words!