![]() |
something that concerns me... - Printable Version +- Kiwike forums (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum) +-- Forum: Community (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Bin (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27) +---- Forum: Kiwike 2.0 archives (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +----- Forum: Server discussion (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +----- Thread: something that concerns me... (/showthread.php?tid=2381) |
RE: something that concerns me... - squiggley1 - 01-11-2012 (01-11-2012, 01:36)geckosquid Wrote:(01-11-2012, 00:11)squiggley1 Wrote: I plan on holding tournaments every now and then (like... 2 times a month and for occasions) for prizes etc. I NEVER DONE IT, WHAT'D I DO? RE: something that concerns me... - The Black Sun - 01-11-2012 I plan on creating a guild that steals from innocent people, I hope no one minds... RE: something that concerns me... - asdfasdflkjty911 - 01-11-2012 (01-10-2012, 08:41)Sir Prize Wrote: Honestly, the reason I will be a bit of a warmongerer is because we didn't see anything of it at all in 2.0. Lol, you wernt here for the Cornerstore war where you then? And seriously though, how can everyone already be saying they are going to be war nations. This isnt a big deal right now, we dont even know if the nations your trying to create will even pass. And if they do, I think a lot of people are putting in to much work for a map that doesnt exist yet. It could be completely different from what you think and may work differently. Ideas and standards for your nation shouldnt be created until after age 1, when you can actually establish the nation... RE: something that concerns me... - bowser956 - 01-11-2012 (01-10-2012, 05:55)squiggley1 Wrote: Alright, so for the past 2 months I've been making agreements and talking to people about revamped.I'm personally offended for a couple of reasons. For one thing, this is a real stab in the back since I tried to help your burgeoning nation with the knowledge of a potential aggressor. Now, I find your spin on this story completely ridiculous. We do not want to restrict production. We also don't plan on any interventions with trade within a nation. We only wish to have a factor with trade between nations and individuals. We do not want to be violent, we just want to be regulatory. The benefit of being within the guilds trade agreement is easier trade through guild centers of trade and the advantage of a larger network of alchemists and enchanters to request ingredients and advice. Another point I would dispute is that we would raid others. We would never bring these agreements onto a town or nation. The issue is purely with the traders. We wouldn't say attack a town of the UR if a member was attempting to trade outside of our trade agreement we wouldn't attack the town but we may:
Edit: (Since the Mage Guild will be run by a council of 6 we shall have a vote about this issue as our first order of business once the council is founded and we have our first session.) RE: something that concerns me... - pavja2 - 01-11-2012 (01-11-2012, 04:15)bowser956 Wrote:(01-10-2012, 05:55)squiggley1 Wrote: Alright, so for the past 2 months I've been making agreements and talking to people about revamped.I'm personally offended for a couple of reasons. For one thing, this is a real stab in the back since I tried to help your burgeoning nation with the knowledge of a potential aggressor. Now, I find your spin on this story completely ridiculous. We do not want to restrict production. We also don't plan on any interventions with trade within a nation. We only wish to have a factor with trade between nations and individuals. We do not want to be violent, we just want to be regulatory. The benefit of being within the guilds trade agreement is easier trade through guild centers of trade and the advantage of a larger network of alchemists and enchanters to request ingredients and advice. Another point I would dispute is that we would raid others. We would never bring these agreements onto a town or nation. The issue is purely with the traders. We wouldn't say attack a town of the UR if a member was attempting to trade outside of our trade agreement we wouldn't attack the town but we may: Trying to decide if I should join your guild or start my own counter-guild... ![]() RE: something that concerns me... - squiggley1 - 01-11-2012 (01-11-2012, 04:47)pavja2 Wrote:(01-11-2012, 04:15)bowser956 Wrote:(01-10-2012, 05:55)squiggley1 Wrote: Alright, so for the past 2 months I've been making agreements and talking to people about revamped.I'm personally offended for a couple of reasons. For one thing, this is a real stab in the back since I tried to help your burgeoning nation with the knowledge of a potential aggressor. Now, I find your spin on this story completely ridiculous. We do not want to restrict production. We also don't plan on any interventions with trade within a nation. We only wish to have a factor with trade between nations and individuals. We do not want to be violent, we just want to be regulatory. The benefit of being within the guilds trade agreement is easier trade through guild centers of trade and the advantage of a larger network of alchemists and enchanters to request ingredients and advice. Another point I would dispute is that we would raid others. We would never bring these agreements onto a town or nation. The issue is purely with the traders. We wouldn't say attack a town of the UR if a member was attempting to trade outside of our trade agreement we wouldn't attack the town but we may: Even though it doesn't involve raiding towns (I do apologize about that the info I got must have been fucked up >.>) it still involves doing unnecessary acts of violence. I do suggest however instead of being a focus of trade, you be a series of universities and colleges that also involve the sale and trade of enchanted weapons and potions. A guild of mages attacking caravans is also horribly OOC by the normal standards. RE: something that concerns me... - doggypwn - 01-11-2012 Depends on if said mages are controlling trade. RE: something that concerns me... - squiggley1 - 01-11-2012 (01-11-2012, 05:11)doggypwn Wrote: Depends on if said mages are controlling trade. being incredibly supportive of free trade I believe such a thing to be a dick move. RE: something that concerns me... - Crashlander04 - 01-11-2012 (01-11-2012, 04:47)pavja2 Wrote:(01-11-2012, 04:15)bowser956 Wrote:(01-10-2012, 05:55)squiggley1 Wrote: Alright, so for the past 2 months I've been making agreements and talking to people about revamped.I'm personally offended for a couple of reasons. For one thing, this is a real stab in the back since I tried to help your burgeoning nation with the knowledge of a potential aggressor. Now, I find your spin on this story completely ridiculous. We do not want to restrict production. We also don't plan on any interventions with trade within a nation. We only wish to have a factor with trade between nations and individuals. We do not want to be violent, we just want to be regulatory. The benefit of being within the guilds trade agreement is easier trade through guild centers of trade and the advantage of a larger network of alchemists and enchanters to request ingredients and advice. Another point I would dispute is that we would raid others. We would never bring these agreements onto a town or nation. The issue is purely with the traders. We wouldn't say attack a town of the UR if a member was attempting to trade outside of our trade agreement we wouldn't attack the town but we may: pav, sometimes I wonder the same thing -.- btw, bowser only speaks for himself atm, the mage guild technically does not exist nor can any of their standards be officiated without future council agreement. RE: something that concerns me... - squiggley1 - 01-11-2012 (01-11-2012, 05:19)Crashlander04 Wrote:(01-11-2012, 04:47)pavja2 Wrote:(01-11-2012, 04:15)bowser956 Wrote:(01-10-2012, 05:55)squiggley1 Wrote: Alright, so for the past 2 months I've been making agreements and talking to people about revamped.I'm personally offended for a couple of reasons. For one thing, this is a real stab in the back since I tried to help your burgeoning nation with the knowledge of a potential aggressor. Now, I find your spin on this story completely ridiculous. We do not want to restrict production. We also don't plan on any interventions with trade within a nation. We only wish to have a factor with trade between nations and individuals. We do not want to be violent, we just want to be regulatory. The benefit of being within the guilds trade agreement is easier trade through guild centers of trade and the advantage of a larger network of alchemists and enchanters to request ingredients and advice. Another point I would dispute is that we would raid others. We would never bring these agreements onto a town or nation. The issue is purely with the traders. We wouldn't say attack a town of the UR if a member was attempting to trade outside of our trade agreement we wouldn't attack the town but we may: yay ![]() ![]() |