![]() |
Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Printable Version +- Kiwike forums (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum) +-- Forum: Community (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Bin (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27) +---- Forum: Kiwike: Revamped (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +----- Forum: Server discussion (http://kiwike.yottabyte.nu/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=62) +----- Thread: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested (/showthread.php?tid=3157) |
RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - oranges44 - 05-04-2012 (05-04-2012, 01:12)Leech Wrote:(05-03-2012, 19:58)oranges44 Wrote:Quote:My complaint is not in the reason of the raid. My complaint is in how raids are carried out. Either they should be raids - which is the strategic insertion of troops to gather intelligence, steal enemy equipment, or remove key positions or troops, and then withdrawal (which, might I add, is done with minimal exposure of the raiders) - or they shouldn't happen at all. >Implying you've actually done anything to prevent these raids. RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - FinnBalto - 05-04-2012 (05-04-2012, 17:58)oranges44 Wrote:(05-04-2012, 01:12)Leech Wrote:(05-03-2012, 19:58)oranges44 Wrote:Quote:My complaint is not in the reason of the raid. My complaint is in how raids are carried out. Either they should be raids - which is the strategic insertion of troops to gather intelligence, steal enemy equipment, or remove key positions or troops, and then withdrawal (which, might I add, is done with minimal exposure of the raiders) - or they shouldn't happen at all. There's really no "preventing" a raid in Minecraft, and applying real world scenarios loses meaning quickly due to some fundamental and gross differences between the game and reality. Walls are a joke and irrelevant against players (but not against mobs). Even placing a full bedrock block sphere around your area does nothing at all unless you also placed a contiguous border in the nether, and would only then be effective if the blocks could not be destroyed by any means by the would-be raider. Tactics that would be used against guerrilla-style warfare are rendered largely meaningless as well because the guerrillas cannot be permanently killed. The strengths of a guerrilla group is that it is small, mobile, and hard to track down. They are able to make surgical strikes and then blend away into the surroundings, making retaliation difficult. Their weakness is usually in supply chain issues (not a problem in Minecraft), and the double-edged sword of being small - losing a member is a huge blow to them (also not an issue in Minecraft as there is no 'death' to speak of). Considering this, the guerrillas are going to inevitably win in any sort of protracted scenario in minecraft, even against a larger, hyper-vigilant defending force. I'll add that attempting to defend in this fashion simply plays into the raiders hands, as they effectively are forcing others to play the game their way, with no regard whatsoever for the defender's choices or opinions. This is, in my mind, why we fundamentally require people to follow the rules, and others to enforce them for those who seem uninterested or incapable of doing so. Without enforcing the rules, this is a PvP server, a game of wolves vs sheep, and is not what the majority signed up for. RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Crazylol5 - 05-04-2012 (05-04-2012, 17:58)oranges44 Wrote:(05-04-2012, 01:12)Leech Wrote:(05-03-2012, 19:58)oranges44 Wrote:Quote:My complaint is not in the reason of the raid. My complaint is in how raids are carried out. Either they should be raids - which is the strategic insertion of troops to gather intelligence, steal enemy equipment, or remove key positions or troops, and then withdrawal (which, might I add, is done with minimal exposure of the raiders) - or they shouldn't happen at all. ![]() RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Leech - 05-04-2012 (05-04-2012, 17:58)oranges44 Wrote:(05-04-2012, 01:12)Leech Wrote:(05-03-2012, 19:58)oranges44 Wrote:Quote:My complaint is not in the reason of the raid. My complaint is in how raids are carried out. Either they should be raids - which is the strategic insertion of troops to gather intelligence, steal enemy equipment, or remove key positions or troops, and then withdrawal (which, might I add, is done with minimal exposure of the raiders) - or they shouldn't happen at all. God you've really been gone a while. I started trying with attempts at peace, and now I'm doing it by fighting back RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - oranges44 - 05-04-2012 Good for you! ![]() RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Android - 05-04-2012 (05-04-2012, 21:26)Leech Wrote: God you've really been gone a while. I started trying with attempts at peace, and now I'm doing it by fighting back (05-04-2012, 21:58)oranges44 Wrote: Good for you! Before any sort of flame engulfs this thread, Leech, you were being condescending in saying that. RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Leech - 05-04-2012 I was? RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Ian25 - 05-04-2012 (05-04-2012, 22:26)Leech Wrote: I was? Yes boi. RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Archprince - 05-05-2012 (05-04-2012, 22:33)Ian25 Wrote:(05-04-2012, 22:26)Leech Wrote: I was? Was he REALLY? Also, I feel as this OP does. That is simply distasteful and makes the server lack ANY semblance of RP. I signed up for RP. If I wanted PVP, I'd pull a Giratina and go play Hunger Games servers nonstop, or at least my friend's Mine4Dead server. -_- RE: Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested - Android - 05-05-2012 Sorry for pulling you out specifically Leech, that goes for a lot of people in this here thread. |