(10-05-2012, 15:21)Leech Wrote: (10-05-2012, 14:24)Crashlander04 Wrote: (10-05-2012, 11:12)iDieForEXP Wrote: (10-05-2012, 06:22)Crashlander04 Wrote: (10-04-2012, 23:30)Leech Wrote: As long as there have been rules, there have been rule-dodgers, those people who will try to find exceptions in the rules and exploit them. Moderators should have the power to stop them
Then the rules should specifically address exceptions. Simple.
There's no way that the rules can encompass all of what should and should not happen on the server. The community needs to step up and take some responsibility for their actions. Even if you do violate something that you didn't know about, someone'll let you know and boom. Now you know. You most likely won't be punished until the second or third time you do something that you know is wrong.
If that thing is blatantly wrong, yes, that makes sense. The problem arises when the action is subjective and controversial. (eg; raiding too much with RP reason, breaking blocks with the intention of fixing them, etc..).
Crash, we get that you're pissed that Ian's banned, you can start making arguments that don't focus on that point now
Here you go Android. I fail to see how Crash is to blame for Leech's hostility, hmm? This topic was on the verge of a fight to begin with, but with iDie taking in the information kindly, and speaking out what he thinks is wrong, and what makes sense, it continued on up to this point. Crash was simply giving two examples, and it escalated to this.
Hell, the first thing you bolded (Which I think is you highliting the hostility?), was something Leech said.
