(04-12-2011, 02:02)Cerce Wrote: Is this sufficient clarrification for the Defendant?
No, it's not. I will make arguments to each of your statements about the quotes I used.
First Quote:
"Yotta was asked and replied to several people asking if that weekend was official wartime. His response was a decisive "No"
Your interpretation of this quote is not adequate to clarify it's meaning.
Should we, for a moment, consider your saying true, we would have to consider that the conflicting rules are based on what the defendant said, not what the OP of the post I quote so much. The defendant does not hold greater power over Yottabyte, and therefore his interpretation of Yottabyte is not greater than Yottabyte's own text, which you say conflicts with what Android said. Remember that Yottabyte's text is what I quote, and it must be held above all, for the server is his, and he writes the rules.
To put it simply, what Yottabyte says goes, clearly. And what Android says, under your interpretation, conflicts with that. If you are to use that interpretation, you must first justify it in the face of what Yottabyte said on the post at:
http://www.minecraftforum.net/viewtopic....69d86b7a58 with which you claim it conflicts with, under your interpretation.
Also note that under my interpretation, there are no conflicting statements, and therefore my interpretation is more correct than yours.
Second Quote:
"As far as the previous weekend not being wartime, if it was, all town plug-ins woud've been froze, as it says in the forums. You should read up as well."
Stealing and killing ( as you call raiding ) I do not contest. Griefing, I do. And griefing took place. blocks were destroyed. That is griefing. Griefing is not raiding, and both took place today. Raiding, as seems obvious, is a different story, and though it happened today, it is the griefing that I am here to clarify. Raiding we can argue about in a different thread
If griefing were allowed out of wartime, then the OP on the post on the forums that I quote so much would feel no need to clarify a time for them,
(taken from
http://www.minecraftforum.net/viewtopic....69d86b7a58)
"Every weekend it's wartime on Kiwike.
During war time, the majority of town commands in the game are frozen so as to not create unwanted effects.
...
No griefing (if not wartime)"
If war time was all time, he wouldn't say "if not wartime". He would say: "griefing is allowed at all times"
However, he clarified when "War Time" is, which means it is a set time. If it was all time, he wouldn't have said that. You must address this before you can turn this quote against me.
The Third Quote:
"Oh, and weekend wartime starts next weekend, not this previous one."
You say this is about the plugin. Nowhere did Android mention that on that post. If he was talking about mods, he would have clarified. But we were talking about rules. Android is smart enough to clarify what he is talking about before going off on a tangent. Or would you beg to differ?
The other two quotes he mentioned plug-in on, but this one? No.
You have done what you accused me of doing: Taking a quote out of context to fit your points. Please clarify, with context, the next quotes you use in your case.
So to answer your question, no. There is not sufficient proof that my evidence is invalid.