Hello There, Guest!
Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
06-03-2012, 06:41,
Post: #141
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
Err... What happened to the "raiding only with permission?"

If they use asdfadsfadsfadsfadfadsfasdfasdfdasdfs to raid us (although they did start attacking, themselves; beside the original point) or say that we're not paying tribute and decide to kill us, aren't they trying to look for loopholes in rules of Kiwike?


06-03-2012, 06:42, (This post was last modified: 06-03-2012, 06:53 by Saera.)
Post: #142
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
We understand that you are trying to have fun. I guess it's the same thing as a killer having fun with murdering others, but it certainly isn't as fun for the victims. There is a certain point with your "fun" when it is starting to hurt other people.

From these past incidents, you were suddenly demanding tributes from people you were just at peace with finally, and then declaring war for pushing you too far? The peace offer itself is rather ridiculous. It sounded more like "terms of surrender".

After that last incident, we have hoped that you'd at least *attempt* to come up with a decent rp. Something that, flamboyant, doesn't bode too well for someone in your position.

[Image: Shipbuilder-sig.jpg]
06-03-2012, 06:44,
Post: #143
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
(06-03-2012, 06:34)Leech Wrote: Here's what's been happening the wbole time. They give "peace offers" with entirely unreasonable demands. Look at their earlier thread. They stated that they can go around the towns and mug people. An excuse to kill people. Either that, or we could dedicate our entire towns to them. What? WHAT? That's not a legitimate peace offer, that's desperately clinging to reasons to go back to war

Seems like an in-character reason to hate them, not a reason to ban them.

1% OF THE POPULATION CONTROL 99% OF THE FORCE

OCCUPY DAGOBAH
06-03-2012, 06:46,
Post: #144
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
(06-03-2012, 06:44)bvcxzmn Wrote:
(06-03-2012, 06:34)Leech Wrote: Here's what's been happening the wbole time. They give "peace offers" with entirely unreasonable demands. Look at their earlier thread. They stated that they can go around the towns and mug people. An excuse to kill people. Either that, or we could dedicate our entire towns to them. What? WHAT? That's not a legitimate peace offer, that's desperately clinging to reasons to go back to war

Seems like an in-character reason to hate them, not a reason to ban them.
Read the first post for the ban reasoning's before posting anything more.

[Image: kb176.png]

[Image: feojd.png]
06-03-2012, 06:51,
Post: #145
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
I was responding to Crash. Quoting people doewn't work well on my Kindle, so I don't try

Leech: Moderating the wiki for over 75 years
[Image: QZj44.gif]
06-03-2012, 07:01, (This post was last modified: 06-03-2012, 07:04 by Ian25.)
Post: #146
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
OP: Ban us because you don't like our rp. Ban us for breaking and replacing blocks. Ban us for shit that happened in 1.fucking.0

The reasons for the ban request then progressed to: Radar mods, douchebaggary, too much raiding, ruing the server, "metagaming", getting the rp names wrong by a few letters, having a record too large to look at without zooming out, starting conflicts, raiding without permission, not googling, interrupting your conspiracies against us, the list goes on and on.

How much s h i t are you trying to throw at us?
(06-03-2012, 07:03)smellityet Wrote:
(06-03-2012, 07:01)Ian25 Wrote: The reasons for the ban request then progressed to: Radar mods, douchebaggary, too much raiding, ruing the server, "metagaming", getting the rp names wrong by a few letters, having a record too large to look at without zooming out, starting conflicts, raiding without permission, not googling, interrupting your conspiracies against us, the list goes on and on.

How much **** are you trying to throw at us?
Is it not enough?

I thought you were against us... Cereal Guy

Edit: wow, just remove your post...
06-03-2012, 07:14,
Post: #147
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
It seems that the root of the problem is the frequency of the raids, which needs to stop. Also, though, I agree with bvcxzmn; the unfair peace demands are reasons to hate them in-game, not reasons to get them banned.

Love,
Gecko
06-03-2012, 07:16, (This post was last modified: 06-03-2012, 07:17 by smellityet.)
Post: #148
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
06-03-2012, 07:17, (This post was last modified: 06-03-2012, 07:18 by Ian25.)
Post: #149
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
(06-03-2012, 07:14)geckosquid Wrote: It seems that the root of the problem is the frequency of the raids, which needs to stop. Also, though, I agree with bvcxzmn; the unfair peace demands are reasons to hate them in-game, not reasons to get them banned.

We raid --> they come to Solitude --> we're allowed to go to counter attack, yes?
Be because that's basically what happened today.
Edit: What I mean is that it's not 'excessive raiding' if they continue it.
06-03-2012, 07:18,
Post: #150
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
(06-03-2012, 07:17)Ian25 Wrote:
(06-03-2012, 07:14)geckosquid Wrote: It seems that the root of the problem is the frequency of the raids, which needs to stop. Also, though, I agree with bvcxzmn; the unfair peace demands are reasons to hate them in-game, not reasons to get them banned.

We raid --> they come to Solitude --> we're allowed to go to counter attack, yes?
Be because that's basically what happened today.

Look at your own diagram. You started the raiding... -_-



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 20 Guest(s)