Hello There, Guest!
In Response to Third Eye: Cerce's Suggestions
04-29-2012, 04:21,
Post: #25
RE: In Response to Third Eye: Cerce's Suggestions
(04-29-2012, 04:04)Fourth Eye Wrote: This thread is interesting - I think that a lot of problems have been left out but it's a step in the right direction. I noticed that comments for the minestatus page were again disabled - which seems to be a way to silence negative opinions rather than correct problems. It is alarming that the staff is electing not to listen to the players on the server but instead stick to some amorphous/arbitrary ideas of what "RP" means - plenty of servers have managed to successfully implement RP without being so fascist and irrational. I have seen no server that is so aggressive in silencing the opinions of disastisfied members - through bans, deleting posts and ad-hominem attacks.

Spelling error.

It can't be Pavja.

TrollDad

"One can concentrate so closely on the words of a sentence that one thereby misses the meaning. As can happen in any area of life. You must never lose focus on the larger landscape."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: In Response to Third Eye: Cerce's Suggestions - by Cerce - 04-29-2012, 04:21

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)