Hello There, Guest!
Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
06-03-2012, 20:28, (This post was last modified: 06-03-2012, 20:30 by Riskae.)
Post: #282
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co
Yeah that's why it's called a ban request and it should not be locked until we come to a conclusion. Threads aren't locked because you don't like the content crash.
(06-03-2012, 20:26)geckosquid Wrote:
(06-03-2012, 20:12)Riskae Wrote:
(06-03-2012, 20:09)NLewis Wrote: I do not understand the logic in this thread.

The point of this thread was to get us ban because we were raiding you guys too much. We have agreed to a comprimise which stops us from raiding and stops you from raiding us so it is not unfair. But now, you want us ban because this is farfetched and it is unfair to You?

Please explain what you want to happen Cell? What do you want?

Did you even read the first post in this thread! The point of this thread is to have you banned because of all the rules you have broken and for being an absolute asshole since 2.0 and even before that.
(06-03-2012, 20:11)geckosquid Wrote: Cell, suggest another compromise if you have one.

Ban them.

That's not a compromise. Read up.

Anyways, a ban on raiding is no longer necessary. Let's just lock this thread.

That's not what this thread is about
You should not lock a thread because it is on topic that is stupid. Just because you think the it was made to "ban raiding" doesn't mean it was.

[Image: r61bo.png]


Messages In This Thread
RE: Ban Request: Nlewis, Pwolbart, Connor and Co - by Riskae - 06-03-2012, 20:28

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 43 Guest(s)