Non Rp killing!

[geckosquid]

+1 Ian
+1 skote
+1 Crash (?)

:3

+1 Success kids

+2 Gecko

[bowser956]

+1 Ian
+1 skote
+1 Crash (?)

:3

+1 Success kids

+2 Gecko

This is a tad off-topic, no?

[geckosquid]

+1 Ian
+1 skote
+1 Crash (?)

:3

+1 Success kids

+2 Gecko

This is a tad off-topic, no?

Sorry, Squiggley.

[Crashlander04]

+1 Ian
+1 skote
+1 Crash (?)

:3

+1 Success kids

+2 Gecko

See, clever Gecko ain't so clever here - even though he thinks he outsmarted us by giving himself 2 points over our original 1 each - The success kid points were each givin to me, Ian, and skote (as we are success kids) giving us each a total of 2.

NOW BACK ON TOPIC DAMNIT

[tristo999]

This depends on if It is classified as nation vs nation comment. Rule 7.3 states that you may not powergame but you may KOS people of a enemy nation. As saying that Smythie is apart of Bowsers nation is Asdf has declared war it would be aloud. Otherwise it would be powergaming.

[Smythie]

Well we don't have a nation, so I can't be part of a non-existing nation.
Edit: Yeah so asdf was clearly powergaming.

[Crashlander04]

The three towns are clearly either allied or part of a sort of confederation - especially considering I've heard characters refer to 'the Capitol'.

Whether or not this raid is considered war, or an act of war - the same rules should hypothetically apply if it were a raid on the group of towns as a whole. I'd hope the rules aren't dead strict as one would believe - allowing for reasonability to shine through to make a proper judgement.

[Smythie]

The three towns are clearly either allied or part of a sort of confederation - especially considering I've heard characters refer to 'the Capitol'.

Whether or not this raid is considered war, or an act of war - the same rules should hypothetically apply if it were a raid on the group of towns as a whole. I'd hope the rules aren't dead strict as one would believe - allowing for reasonability to shine through to make a proper judgement.

asdf had still never spoken to me in game before and could have no idea who I was. The only tie I had to bowser was that I was standing in a town near his which doesn't even mean I am part of it, I could have been a person travelling through. It doesn't exclude the fact that it was a non-rp killing.

[Saera]

Can I say something? THERE ARE NO NATIONS ITS ONLY THE FIRST AGE. STOP ALL THIS NONSENSE /ragequit

[Crashlander04]

The three towns are clearly either allied or part of a sort of confederation - especially considering I've heard characters refer to 'the Capitol'.

Whether or not this raid is considered war, or an act of war - the same rules should hypothetically apply if it were a raid on the group of towns as a whole. I'd hope the rules aren't dead strict as one would believe - allowing for reasonability to shine through to make a proper judgement.

asdf had still never spoken to me in game before and could have no idea who I was. The only tie I had to bowser was that I was standing in a town near his which doesn't even mean I am part of it, I could have been a person travelling through. It doesn't exclude the fact that it was a non-rp killing.

Then it would appear that you were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Simple mistake of fact on part of his character - hardly anything to get really worked up over :/ I mean, it was a raid after all. Assuming his character has a legitimate reason to raid, and knew the location of the towns (relating them to bowser is easily justifiable, but that's not the problem) there shouldn't really be an RP problem here.

Whether or not you are simply very upset about getting killed over an in-character misunderstanding, which I'm sure you are as I would be too, that is nothing Asdf should be banned over.