RFW Leaderboards

[Sir Prize]

No, I've been keeping record since the last three (now four) official Kiwike games.
The list will be updated with the latest scores tomorrow.

[Sir Prize]

Leaderboards have now been updated with Sunday's game.

Tomorrow I will add mic info and win/loss ratio. Note that Win/Loss ratio should not be used for team balancing, it's simply there for eye candy.

Also, this system is now ready to use. You can either ask me to make the teams, or try to balance them yourself by calculating the total Elo of the team and then dividing it by the number of team members and try to get the Elo of each team as close to eachother as possible.

[yottabyte]

Just wondering, were you using the google doc I made or just looking at the threads? Because the teams listed in the threads are usually not accurate.

[DjFuzz]

Liking the system but there is one thing I hate, if I have played a fair amount of Games and have low rating, is there a way to make it so that not playing a game does not rank pu up, i have one and lost two games each but players who have lost and one a single game have a higher score like Godfrey for example, could you make this different as it would seem to fit much more.

[Sir Prize]

I was using the threads. Not even aware there were a Google document.

[yottabyte]

Well, that explains why the numbers are so inaccurate

Edit: here it is btw https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?...0pJTDNzdVE

[Sir Prize]

Liking the system but there is one thing I hate, if I have played a fair amount of Games and have low rating, is there a way to make it so that not playing a game does not rank pu up, i have one and lost two games each but players who have lost and one a single game have a higher score like Godfrey for example, could you make this different as it would seem to fit much more.

This is actually an inherent downside of Elo. New players jump up and down a lot until they finally settle for their real score.
Most counter this by putting the players in an evaluation period where you are only paired with other evaluation players.
However, this is not really possible here seeing as how we simply don't have enough players.

Thinking about what you said though, I've come up with a solution.
New players will have an acting Elo for the first three games. Which is 1200 in this case. However, their real Elo level is counted in the background but won't come into play until 3 matches have been played.
I will try to set this up as soon as possible tomorrow.

[DjFuzz]

Liking the system but there is one thing I hate, if I have played a fair amount of Games and have low rating, is there a way to make it so that not playing a game does not rank pu up, i have one and lost two games each but players who have lost and one a single game have a higher score like Godfrey for example, could you make this different as it would seem to fit much more.

This is actually an inherent downside of Elo. New players jump up and down a lot until they finally settle for their real score.
Most counter this by putting the players in an evaluation period where you are only paired with other evaluation players.
However, this is not really possible here seeing as how we simply don't have enough players.

Thinking about what you said though, I've come up with a solution.
New players will have an acting Elo for the first three games. Which is 1200 in this case. However, their real Elo level is counted in the background but won't come into play until 3 matches have been played.
I will try to set this up as soon as possible tomorrow.

Ok thanks alot sir, would stop these people making me look bad

[Sir Prize]

Well, that explains why the numbers are so inaccurate

Edit: here it is btw https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?...0pJTDNzdVE

Yotta, it's impossible to use that. I need to know the exact teams from each game.

[yottabyte]

Tsk tsk. I will try to get something together with the team lists.