Poll: How do you stand on this bill? (House of Commerce members only)

Cell · (This post was last modified: 10-20-2011, 04:32 by Cell.)

The bill i'm about to propose has two different sides to it.

The first part of the bill, has to due with timing on bills.
As of currently not a single bill has made a final decision due to needing more Commerce members to vote for a clear majority. With this, I would like to propose that a set time of 72 hours, which is subject to change, be put on every bill once it is purposed. The final vote count shall be the decision.

The second part of this bill, has to due with the amount of bill's proposed by a single person.
This has come up due to the fact of Crashlander creating many bills in the past few days, which isn't technically a bad thing. But is quite confusing, and as of now, we have multiple bills just by him open and still voting. What I am proposing is that after the bill you just proposed is finished, in say 72 hours, then you are allowed to propose the next. This limits the amount of bills that are currently open, and allows more concentration to one or the other, not to a cluster of 3-5 at once, allowing a much clearer decision among the house.

This is all subject to change if the timing is not liked, etc.

Android · 10-20-2011, 10:58,

I'm in favor.

Ian25 · 10-20-2011, 13:44,

I'm in favour too

tristo999 · 10-20-2011, 13:51,

Yes sirry

Spammuff · 10-20-2011, 14:47,

Whoooo go celly!

Leech · 10-20-2011, 14:52,

I'm not part of the house, but I agree

Saera · 10-20-2011, 16:20,

I approve of this

Crashlander04 · 10-20-2011, 21:41,

I agree with the first part, but for the second half, I understand I have posted quite a few bills, but that's because I have a lot of ideas and I like to get things done. I would think a 24 hour (possibly even less) waiting period for posting bills would be sufficient enough, especially considering events take hold very quickly in this nation and it is necessary to bring ideas and proposals to the attention of the nation.

Cell · 10-20-2011, 21:43,

I know, and thats what I said in the bill. You have been posting a lot of ideas which is good. But having two many strains the concentration of some memebers, and therefore its like worrying about 5 different things at once. Thats why the 72 hour limit is there. It will be cut down if the majority vote against it.

Crashlander04 · 10-20-2011, 21:45,

You do realize 72 hours is three days right? Wars start and end within three days.

I would also like to inquire if this would also limit proposed modifications of other legislature or bills in effect..

Poll: How do you stand on this bill? (House of Commerce members only) This poll is closed.
I vote for this bill to be passed.	77.78%	7	77.78%
I only vote for the first part of this bill to be passed.	22.22%	2	22.22%
I only vote for the second part of this bill to be passed.	0%	0	0%
I vote for this bill to be vetoed.	0%	0	0%
I am impartial to this bill.	0%	0	0%
Total		9 vote(s)	100%