Poll: How do you stand on this bill? (House of Commerce members only)

Cell · 10-20-2011, 22:04,

We can edit them for wars if needed. But 72 hours is three days, im aware.

skote11 · 10-20-2011, 22:48,

i vote for the first part of the bill but mabye a 24 hour limit per bill would be best? because why stunt such good ideas so greatly cell

?

Crashlander04 · (This post was last modified: 10-20-2011, 22:51 by Crashlander04.)

Bill 9.1 Modification/Proposal - What if we were to make 2 different categories? Quick-bills, and Full-bills - you'd need consent from Android to post a quick-bill which would be decided upon within 12-24 hours, while full-bills would be regular, no rush, "everybody take your times deciding" bills with a 72 hour waiting period.

And the quick-bills would need no set time limit between postings as they are direct permissions from Android so he could control the amount as he wishes.

skote11 · 10-20-2011, 22:52,

good idea sir a very good idea

Cell · (This post was last modified: 10-20-2011, 22:56 by Cell.)

The point of this is so that Android is not as involved as much. As bad as that sounds, if android where to go away for a week, what would we do bill wise? We not need rely on a person. Therefore you modification has been declined.

Crashlander04 · (This post was last modified: 10-21-2011, 00:34 by Crashlander04.)

So instead of depending on one sure-fire person for quick-bills, you'd rather depend on nobody, never have the option, and never get anything done in less than three days? Android, help a brother out here.

Spammuff · 10-21-2011, 01:28,

No, were good, let him burn.... :3

Android · 10-21-2011, 01:50,

Mind as well have the idea of 'quick' bills rather than nothing, no? Although they'd be limited if I can't get to the computer or something like that, 'long' bills will always be there.

What do you say Cellular?

Cell · 10-21-2011, 01:59,

The problem is, if no one can catch you online for days at a time due to them not being on when you are, and they have an amazing idea for a bill, they can't present it until they finally get a hold of you.
And what exactly would be the point of quick bills, other than to have them finish up in 24 hours instead of 72 hours?

Android · 10-21-2011, 02:54,

(10-21-2011, 01:59)Cell Wrote: The problem is, if no one can catch you online for days at a time due to them not being on when you are, and they have an amazing idea for a bill, they can't present it until they finally get a hold of you.
And what exactly would be the point of quick bills, other than to have them finish up in 24 hours instead of 72 hours?

I suppose we'd have to have criteria as to describe what a quick bill would entail.

Unless it varies a lot from what a normal bill would be, maybe we'd benefit in not having such things.

Poll: How do you stand on this bill? (House of Commerce members only) This poll is closed.
I vote for this bill to be passed.	77.78%	7	77.78%
I only vote for the first part of this bill to be passed.	22.22%	2	22.22%
I only vote for the second part of this bill to be passed.	0%	0	0%
I vote for this bill to be vetoed.	0%	0	0%
I am impartial to this bill.	0%	0	0%
Total		9 vote(s)	100%