Hello There, Guest!
ban appeal pandabob
10-24-2011, 21:45,
Post: #81
RE: ban appeal pandabob
(10-24-2011, 21:33)partyars Wrote:
(10-24-2011, 21:04)Spammuff Wrote: Totally not 'Oke'

you should be banned again.

I second this, nothing personal but as I said in my last post, other banned people who got back using an alt got banned on their alts too, terinon for example or more recently sponky.

Leadmau was also banned for being a Alt of ZupZup.
10-24-2011, 22:11,
Post: #82
RE: ban appeal pandabob
(10-24-2011, 19:39)Unreal22 Wrote:
(10-24-2011, 11:41)Cell Wrote:
(10-24-2011, 10:58)Unreal22 Wrote:
(10-24-2011, 00:19)bowser956 Wrote: Is mayonnaise an instrument?

No Patrick, mayonnaise is not an instrument.

For some odd reason, I have some feeling that Unreal didn't have to watch the video to know what he says in reply Poker face

Nope.... Smiley

same I came

Leech: Moderating the wiki for over 75 years
[Image: QZj44.gif]
10-24-2011, 22:59,
Post: #83
RE: ban appeal pandabob
Panda, I highly doubt that Android would have approved that.

Love,
Gecko
10-24-2011, 23:16,
Post: #84
RE: ban appeal pandabob
(10-24-2011, 22:59)geckosquid Wrote: Panda, I highly doubt that Android would have approved that.

Ask him


[Image: banner_76.png] [SSSS]
10-25-2011, 02:33,
Post: #85
RE: ban appeal pandabob
(10-24-2011, 23:16)pandabob Wrote:
(10-24-2011, 22:59)geckosquid Wrote: Panda, I highly doubt that Android would have approved that.

Ask him

still, even if he approved, you're dumb going around shouting "hi i'm panda"

(10-14-2012, 06:21)sethd13 Wrote: 9/10 actually really liked that <3 party always has good music
[Image: Kon-Signature-2.gif]
10-25-2011, 05:05, (This post was last modified: 10-25-2011, 22:35 by bowser956.)
Post: #86
RE: ban appeal pandabob
He approved it. >_>
10-25-2011, 16:24,
Post: #87
RE: ban appeal pandabob
(10-25-2011, 05:05)bowser956 Wrote: He approved it. >Sad

SoMuchWin WIN


[Image: banner_76.png] [SSSS]
10-26-2011, 14:21,
Post: #88
RE: ban appeal pandabob
Colonel Mustard does not agree

Leech: Moderating the wiki for over 75 years
[Image: QZj44.gif]
10-27-2011, 15:27,
Post: #89
RE: ban appeal pandabob
I approved it under the condition that he didn't do the very thing he ended up doing.

I made a decision to trust him again as we may have done in the past, but that decision proved to be a bad one, seeing as how he went shouting to people that he was back after I had said to be quiet about it.

Re-evaluating another ban for his alternate, for being plain stupid.
10-27-2011, 15:56,
Post: #90
RE: ban appeal pandabob
Sweet Jesus Have Mercy



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 20 Guest(s)