A New Kind of Anti X-Ray

guthriearmstrong · (This post was last modified: 03-08-2012, 07:48 by guthriearmstrong.)

http://forums.bukkit.org/threads/sec-ore...st-1007619

It basically trolls x-rayers by turning ALL blocks into ore blocks or chests when an xray texture pack or mod is used.
This would help with our bug of xrayers finding things that aren't totally covered.

andy66252 · (This post was last modified: 03-08-2012, 04:18 by andy66252.)

troll level=God

DjFuzz · 03-08-2012, 09:16,

We have looked onto this plugin many times, And we would use it if thereveasnt the one problem, Lag. This puts large stress on the server and using it on the current server with a large amount of player that we will get when revamped is here, it would show ore books and chests everywhere so the option would be to upgrade the server that we need money for

geckosquid · 03-08-2012, 09:46,

(03-08-2012, 09:16)DjFuzz Wrote: thereveasnt

Um... Quite.

DjFuzz · 03-08-2012, 09:52,

(03-08-2012, 09:46)geckosquid Wrote:
(03-08-2012, 09:16)DjFuzz Wrote: thereveasnt
Um... Quite.

That is why you dont by apple iPods, damn autocorrect thing

~~pavja2~~ · 03-08-2012, 09:56,

I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change.

iDieForEXP · 03-08-2012, 10:02,

(03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change.

I really like what spout does, but it adds insane lag for me.

DjFuzz · (This post was last modified: 03-08-2012, 10:12 by DjFuzz.)

(03-08-2012, 10:02)iDieForEXP Wrote:
(03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change.

I really like what spout does, but it adds insane lag for me.

Yes I agree, The Features are great, but the lag unbearable. Normal minecraft I get around 230-300 FPS and on spout I get a very unstable 50 FPS or lower.

But I guess with the new SMP api may have some ways of eliminating unwanted mods

partyars · 03-08-2012, 10:17,

(03-08-2012, 10:09)DjFuzz Wrote:
(03-08-2012, 10:02)iDieForEXP Wrote:
(03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change.

I really like what spout does, but it adds insane lag for me.

Yes I agree, The Features are great, but the lag unbearable. Normal minecraft I get around 230-300 FPS and on spout I get a very unstable 50 FPS or lower.
But I guess with the new SMP api may have some ways of eliminating unwanted mods

Or maybe it's because you have a crappy computer. TrollDad

DjFuzz · 03-08-2012, 10:26,

(03-08-2012, 10:17)partyars Wrote:
(03-08-2012, 10:09)DjFuzz Wrote:
(03-08-2012, 10:02)iDieForEXP Wrote:
(03-08-2012, 09:56)pavja2 Wrote: I am still in favor of requiring spout and having server side controls over client side mods and texture packs. It's the best way to deal with the issue even if some people are afraid of change.

I really like what spout does, but it adds insane lag for me.

Yes I agree, The Features are great, but the lag unbearable. Normal minecraft I get around 230-300 FPS and on spout I get a very unstable 50 FPS or lower.
But I guess with the new SMP api may have some ways of eliminating unwanted mods

Or maybe it's because you have a crappy computer.

Well maybe ponys suck also