Ban Appeal (Hear me out)

Android · 09-22-2012, 05:19,

(09-21-2012, 23:32)Crashlander04 Wrote: Is that so? Last time I checked, you have to ability to look at account IP's.

But once again, bravo on the condescending, uninformed, and biased assumption!

Ah, forgive me. That was meant to sound more light-hearted than it came out.

bvcxzmn · 09-22-2012, 05:26,

(09-22-2012, 05:19)Android Wrote:
(09-21-2012, 23:32)Crashlander04 Wrote: Is that so? Last time I checked, you have to ability to look at account IP's.

But once again, bravo on the condescending, uninformed, and biased assumption!

Ah, forgive me. That was meant to sound more light-hearted than it came out.

I thought it was funny... Okay

Mr.Vanilla Milkshake · 09-22-2012, 06:13,

Well i'm done arguing on chipmonks behalf, I will say one thing though and that is if chipmonk came back intending to grief he would have told one of us. Then again that means you have to trust one of us which is probably much harder then it is to trust chipmonk. I will make the point that I have no reason NOT to tell you if he intended to come back and grief, but I suppose you have to trust that too.

Also bvc I wasn't referring specifically to you with that statement, just the people in general that keep switching sides.

Cerce · 09-22-2012, 06:39,

(09-21-2012, 08:16)Cerce Wrote: Dude, just lock the thread. I just got done with the third page, and I agree. Enough butthurt is enough. I don't need to read the rest.

bvcxzmn · (This post was last modified: 09-22-2012, 06:57 by bvcxzmn.)

(09-22-2012, 06:13)Mr.Vanilla Milkshake Wrote: Well i'm done arguing on chipmonks behalf, I will say one thing though and that is if chipmonk came back intending to grief he would have told one of us. Then again that means you have to trust one of us which is probably much harder then it is to trust chipmonk. I will make the point that I have no reason NOT to tell you if he intended to come back and grief, but I suppose you have to trust that too.

Also bvc I wasn't referring specifically to you with that statement, just the people in general that keep switching sides.

I was also talking about everyone to some extent. In addition to my belief that everyone deserves the right to change their opinion, sometimes people may seem like they have switched a side for some reason or another, but they haven't. Not that there's anything wrong with a simple misunderstanding, especially on something as insignificant as this, just be careful with what you assume in life. This message applies to everyone in the world, don't assume something if you are not sure it is true.

sethd13 · 09-22-2012, 07:00,

(09-22-2012, 06:55)bvcxzmn Wrote: don't assume something if you are not sure it is true.

Isn't that what assuming is?

bvcxzmn · 09-22-2012, 07:14,

Not necessarily.

Mr.Vanilla Milkshake · (This post was last modified: 09-22-2012, 07:46 by Mr.Vanilla Milkshake.)

No there is a few people I have seen from the time I joined the server who switch around at the flip of a switch, no pun intended. Those were MAINLY who I was referring to.

And I just realized I confused this thread with the vote of non confidence one. Everyone else ignore that statement about switching sides, i'm surprised anyone even knew what I was talking about.

bvcxzmn · 09-22-2012, 08:17,

Me too! :p

chipmonk0155 · 09-25-2012, 16:23,

So how about that derailment? I think we need to get back on topic here.