11-10-2011, 00:13,
|
|
Cell
Bookshelf Miner
XCellX
|
|
Posts: 2,279
Threads: 62
Joined: Jan 2011
|
Cell
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
Dang Squig, thats nice.
|
|
11-10-2011, 00:37,
|
|
yottabyte
Bookshelf Miner
yottabyte
|
|
Posts: 4,134
Threads: 320
Joined: Nov 2010
|
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
Putting a lock on this thread soon...
|
|
11-10-2011, 00:38,
|
|
fashionmonkey
Redstone Miner
Fashionmonkey
|
|
Posts: 233
Threads: 29
Joined: Feb 2011
|
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
Biased opinion if ive ever heard it. Should it be:
Stay with 2.0
Vote for 3.0
Saying "for a while" and "its time for new world" in a vote is just silly.
|
|
11-10-2011, 00:44,
|
|
DjFuzz
Bedrock Miner
DjFuzz
|
|
Posts: 1,399
Threads: 57
Joined: Apr 2011
|
DjFuzz
hsxfuzzball
|
Mr Fuzz X
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
Lets all just stop with all this 3.0 Stuff as it will come but everyone keep going in aboutvit wont make it Happen any quicker, The Admins may have plays for a new map whick may Happen soon or in a fair time away.
We are fine with what we have,
|
|
11-10-2011, 00:44,
|
|
fashionmonkey
Redstone Miner
Fashionmonkey
|
|
Posts: 233
Threads: 29
Joined: Feb 2011
|
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
"keep the old and trusted map that we all loved and play" 2.0
OR
"Make a new map and have to start again" 3.0
see? i can do that too.
Make the vote at least yes or no and not ur opinion on the vote.
|
|
11-10-2011, 00:47,
|
|
DjFuzz
Bedrock Miner
DjFuzz
|
|
Posts: 1,399
Threads: 57
Joined: Apr 2011
|
DjFuzz
hsxfuzzball
|
Mr Fuzz X
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
Fashion this thread was made Months ago
|
|
11-10-2011, 00:48,
|
|
fashionmonkey
Redstone Miner
Fashionmonkey
|
|
Posts: 233
Threads: 29
Joined: Feb 2011
|
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
26 pages DJ.
|
|
11-10-2011, 08:55,
|
|
nsanexer0
Gold Miner
nfmous
|
|
Posts: 487
Threads: 33
Joined: Dec 2010
|
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
Well its been necro'd twice I believe, however yes the opinion in the vote is kinda unneeded but you see where to vote went.
We are not gonna stay on the same map forever, that's just a fact but I think with the final version of minecraft the biome code would be 100% done?
However I think mavenholm if we start on a new map should be world edited in, and add some ruines to it like a gaint war happend? Haha
|
|
11-11-2011, 07:10,
|
|
sethd13
Bookshelf Miner
sethd13
|
|
Posts: 1,526
Threads: 91
Joined: Jul 2011
|
Captain_Crunch97
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
the whole point of new map is to get rid of that
(08-21-2012, 03:16)Cerce Wrote: Molesting children is just a bonus.
|
|
11-12-2011, 00:01,
|
|
TehCthulhu
Redstone Miner
TehCthulhu
|
|
Posts: 201
Threads: 28
Joined: May 2011
|
M0R5
|
|
|
RE: Kiwike 3.0?
I haven't read this entire thread front to back, so I'm just going to carelessly throw my opinion on the pile of comments.
I support this, Ruenge has lost its novelty to me and I have a new idea for a city that I would like to use in the new server.
I also support dissolving of all existing nation, towns, ect. and the reset (to 0) of bank accounts.
I think it would be good if peoples' inventories did not get reset, so they have an opportunity to "pack" some supplies for the new map. Of course, this would also require some level of spawn protection, so when everyone logs in it's not just a winner-take-all battle royal.
I feel like Kiwkie (in some respects) has turned into a bunch of rich kids, aimlessly derping about. It's turned into a server where all the active players probably have more money than God and it's a very hard environment to be a new player in. That's why I think a total wipe would be nice.
|
|
|