Hello There, Guest!
Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
04-29-2012, 06:12,
Post: #11
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
Woah, the server might get some peace and quite for a few days...



04-29-2012, 06:20,
Post: #12
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
I get that it's only a few people. but think about playing sports or working. when someone screws up you all end up paying for it even if it isn't fair to some

[Image: eJw9ijEKQjEQBfuc4l1AwUjSK4iNYKFgvZpVA8kG...MDAC7V.png]
04-29-2012, 06:31,
Post: #13
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
Now, this is about Bowser and Riskae here. To my knowledge not once have you tried to make peace with us. We did have a 'peace' treaty until you two broke it by trying to kill me when I was visiting your town. There is no reason for you to be complaining about us.

This includes Funnycop, if you want us to stop raiding then tell to your leader to talk to us, don't just bitch about it to us while we are raiding and then force us to stay while we are interrogated by a moderator. Also, if you admit you have anger issues you are either A) Faking it because you think it makes you look 'cool'. or B) You actually have anger issues but you think the right thing to do is complain to some people over the internet instead of seeing a therapist. I'm not making fun of you but you should see a therapist.
04-29-2012, 06:38,
Post: #14
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
If you wanted peace, and knew the tensions were high... Why visit their town in the first place... I mean, just saying...



04-29-2012, 07:53,
Post: #15
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
(04-29-2012, 06:38)asdfasdflkjty911 Wrote: If you wanted peace, and knew the tensions were high... Why visit their town in the first place... I mean, just saying...
And it's not just that he visited. Earlier that day Leowester was seen digging tunnels in Ageos, and Skote had held up Funnycop at sword point for everything he had on him at the inn. Ian came with a mask and full diamond armor. He didn't just waltz in right after the ink dried on a treaty and get stabbed.
04-29-2012, 08:26,
Post: #16
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
I find it funny that they can't handle the fact that now, raids are monitored. It isn't a ban on raiding. It's a ban on raiding for the wrong reasons, and doing anything during the raid that a mod would disallow. Those are all things that should of been done regardless, but apparently this "ban" had to be set up because people couldn't follow the rules.
04-29-2012, 08:29,
Post: #17
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
It's not necessarily because they couldn't follow the rules, Yakabis. It's because the staff wanted to monitor the RP reasons for raiding due to the excessive amounts of it.

Love,
Gecko
04-29-2012, 08:39,
Post: #18
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
Which is totally understandable. If they have a legitimate reason for the raids, There should be no problem.
04-29-2012, 13:54,
Post: #19
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
Oh, information overload.


(04-29-2012, 06:31)Ian25 Wrote: Now, this is about Bowser and Riskae here. To my knowledge not once have you tried to make peace with us. We did have a 'peace' treaty until you two broke it by trying to kill me when I was visiting your town. There is no reason for you to be complaining about us.

On the nations behalf, I tried to make peace every chance I got. And let me tell you this- It was a hell of a lot easier with everyone else I've made peace with, because I've gotten pretty unreasonable terms and unreasonable "meetings" with you guys. I know the others have too. We all know you don't expect Bowser to step down, so why is that your main term?

(04-29-2012, 06:31)Ian25 Wrote: A) Faking it because you think it makes you look 'cool'. or You actually have anger issues but you think the right thing to do is complain to some people over the internet instead of seeing a therapist. I'm not making fun of you but you should see a therapist.

Yes, he does have actual anger management problems.

(04-29-2012, 05:56)Cell Wrote: I used the first, A, for an example. Not for specifics.

I do not control those people Leech, i'm simple asking that those that were not involved not be punished. If they would like their restriction lifted for what they did, as I have very little information on it, then can reply here.

I know you do not control them, and I'm not talkting strictly at you. Your collective group should be condemning these quite long raids. And, if we specifically blacklisted NLewis and Giratina, A) They could get a third person and :tag along on that person's raid", or the group would just complain that it's just trying to control your great fighter

Leech: Moderating the wiki for over 75 years
[Image: QZj44.gif]
04-29-2012, 14:07, (This post was last modified: 04-29-2012, 14:10 by Cell.)
Post: #20
RE: Southern Coalition - No Raiding Appeal
I have yet to see a complaint about it protecting Giratina from one of us.

I'm just trying to get a few things straight here.
This is not an appeal for those that participated in the recent raid on an un-named town. I have no idea what happened there, and its not my position to defend it. This is for those that had nothing to do with that at all, those that logged on restricted, with no idea why.

The most I have heard on this situation is because of the "excessive" raiding, which, was never spoken of. The only thing that has been confronted by moderators, if my memory serves correctly, is the fact that we stood in a single place for too long. Not because of multiple attacks in a day.

Again, this is not an appeal to all of the members of the Southern Coalition, I can't help but think that "raid" yesterday had something to do with this, and since I was not involved, I can not defend them. I just want some insight on the situation.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)