Non-rp killing - broader rules clarification and discussion requested

[theonedoctor]

Guys i think you are not really getting the grip on what is gonna happen. So far there are only three options we
A: Encourage Rp but not really do anything about it. the problem with this is what is the point
B: Screw the Rp but again what would be the point of this server being any diffrent
C: start banning people who do not follow strict Rp which would lead to problems with people trying to get the raider ban for a little mistake like "He did not ask me if i was part of the town even though i was walking around in it" and that would just make angry ban people like Pavja2
So those are the options kiwike.se has at the moment. I personally think that right now A is the best option tell me if you agree or disagree

[Yakabis]

I disagree, there are always more creative options that are available, Life is no defined by a,c,d. There could be an "AB" or "AC", somewhere between the two, or even an option you did not consider "Z".
These aren't the only options that kiwike has.

[Crashlander04]

I disagree, there are always more creative options that are available, Life is no defined by a,c,d. There could be an "AB" or "AC", somewhere between the two, or even an option you did not consider "Z".
These aren't the only options that kiwike has.

Probably the best thing I've ever heard you say.

I vote option 'x^2' personally.

[Ian25]

My character wants to play this like a game of Risk.

[Sebiale]

Guys i think you are not really getting the grip on what is gonna happen. So far there are only three options we
A: Encourage Rp but not really do anything about it. the problem with this is what is the point
B: Screw the Rp but again what would be the point of this server being any diffrent
C: start banning people who do not follow strict Rp which would lead to problems with people trying to get the raider ban for a little mistake like "He did not ask me if i was part of the town even though i was walking around in it" and that would just make angry ban people like Pavja2
So those are the options kiwike.se has at the moment. I personally think that right now A is the best option tell me if you agree or disagree

I agree with Yakabis on this--that's just a false dilemma.

[geckosquid]

Guys i think you are not really getting the grip on what is gonna happen. So far there are only three options we
A: Encourage Rp but not really do anything about it. the problem with this is what is the point
B: Screw the Rp but again what would be the point of this server being any diffrent
C: start banning people who do not follow strict Rp which would lead to problems with people trying to get the raider ban for a little mistake like "He did not ask me if i was part of the town even though i was walking around in it" and that would just make angry ban people like Pavja2
So those are the options kiwike.se has at the moment. I personally think that right now A is the best option tell me if you agree or disagree

Yeah, no.

[iDieForEXP]

Lol, couldn'ta put it better myself ^

[Raszh]

My character wants to play this like a game of Risk.

Meaning it's really you, the player, that wants to play it like a game of Risk, amirite?

[Ian25]

My character wants to play this like a game of Risk.

Meaning it's really you, the player, that wants to play it like a game of Risk, amirite?

Well I make the character so if you want to put it that way, be my guest.

[oranges44]

Well you can't really have a strict RP server when 90% of peoples important judgements and what to do are based entirely on Non - IC reasoning , (Leowester leaving because we make fun of him in skype). That is OOC And shouldn't effect his in - game decisioning but it does. The way I see it you could make it more strict RP by disabling messaging. This will ensure that people actually have to travel , send letters and won't just do /msg Hey meet me at X: , Z:
Just an idea.