Hello There, Guest!
Single block towers
04-27-2011, 23:34, (This post was last modified: 04-27-2011, 23:34 by Reshe.)
Post: #11
RE: Single block towers
(04-27-2011, 22:57)fashionmonkey Wrote: ok so what? A 6x6 siege tower allowing us to get into the walls is ok? this pvp/nogriefing rules are starting to conflict and confuse me.

There are no conflicting rules. The rule is no single block towers. However, everyone loves to be able to attack towns. So we are proposing reasonable ways that can be done. For example, the suggestions above... a 3x3 tower with stairs or a 6x6 tower with ladders built outside the wall that can allow people to cross over the wall. Constructing this would create a point of conflict where people would be encouraged to pvp.
Reply
04-27-2011, 23:50, (This post was last modified: 04-16-2012, 22:52 by The Black Sun.)
Post: #12
RE: Single block towers
[Removed by User]
Reply
04-28-2011, 00:47,
Post: #13
RE: Single block towers
The only problem is if the wall is protected then it cant be dumped on with water. In my opinion, i believe the one by one towers where supposed to be not place all over the lands of Kiwike randomly. Building a 6x6 siege tower is an outrageous idea that will surely get you killed, because of the time taken to do so. 1x1 towers to get into towns should be able to be constructed, and would not be a problem if you protected the area around the walls.
Reply
04-28-2011, 01:04,
Post: #14
RE: Single block towers
(04-27-2011, 23:34)Reshe Wrote:
(04-27-2011, 22:57)fashionmonkey Wrote: ok so what? A 6x6 siege tower allowing us to get into the walls is ok? this pvp/nogriefing rules are starting to conflict and confuse me.

There are no conflicting rules. The rule is no single block towers. However, everyone loves to be able to attack towns. So we are proposing reasonable ways that can be done. For example, the suggestions above... a 3x3 tower with stairs or a 6x6 tower with ladders built outside the wall that can allow people to cross over the wall. Constructing this would create a point of conflict where people would be encouraged to pvp.

Hmm i get what ya mean but... Why not just expand the plots around ur Town/city so non residents cant build a tower to get over the walls in the first place?

I think thats how the towny mod is normaly meant to be used.
Reply
04-28-2011, 05:03,
Post: #15
RE: Single block towers
+1 for Fashion monkey

-Master Stone Cutter-
-The Roadbuilders-
Reply
04-28-2011, 05:13,
Post: #16
RE: Single block towers
(04-28-2011, 01:04)fashionmonkey Wrote:
(04-27-2011, 23:34)Reshe Wrote:
(04-27-2011, 22:57)fashionmonkey Wrote: ok so what? A 6x6 siege tower allowing us to get into the walls is ok? this pvp/nogriefing rules are starting to conflict and confuse me.

There are no conflicting rules. The rule is no single block towers. However, everyone loves to be able to attack towns. So we are proposing reasonable ways that can be done. For example, the suggestions above... a 3x3 tower with stairs or a 6x6 tower with ladders built outside the wall that can allow people to cross over the wall. Constructing this would create a point of conflict where people would be encouraged to pvp.

Hmm i get what ya mean but... Why not just expand the plots around ur Town/city so non residents cant build a tower to get over the walls in the first place?

I think thats how the towny mod is normaly meant to be used.


Indeed it is. However, no one has made their borders in such a way that a 1x1 tower can't gain them access so really it doesn't matter if towny is used how it should be or not. The point here is the absurdity of being able to run up to a wall and pole vault over it with little effort. Make people put a little effort into getting over walls, because people put considerable effort into building them.
Reply
04-28-2011, 22:26,
Post: #17
RE: Single block towers
Bludwick has a moat. Around the moat is claimed. Break the bridge and the town is safe from raids, but in lockdown mode.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)