Suggestion/Poll: Mob Griefing

[iDieForEXP]

Well yotta, I'm going to use an example from Revamped to play the devil's advocate on your statement. You said that killing someone would make them want to pull out their good gear, and although that happens occassionally (probably around 75% of the time), there will always be people with maxed out weapons and armor who refuse to pull it out for fear of losing it. Instead they coughsitinacavealldayandgetmorewealththeyneverusecough.

[bvcxzmn]

Shaun767. Yup yup! But he's banned now for xray.

[iDieForEXP]

LOL! Although that's probably true, I was reffering distinctly to someone a bit more well known

[yottabyte]

Then attack the 75% who would bring out the good gear. Derp.

[iDieForEXP]

Yeah. But theres always going to be nations that are lead by the 25%. Sadly its an unescapable dilemma D:

[Gira]

Yotta , clearly this idea is just complete crap. I mean seriously? On a server where tactical thinking is encouraged you decide to add something that is pretty game - changing just to make it a more casual experience for the people who don't want to think of ways to protect their crap? Or is this just you trying to 'outsmart' crash knowing you've both had heated arguments in the past? If you want to protect luxuries why don't we just make chests invincible as well cause that probably falls under the equally dumb rule of 'dont be a dick' , seriously in a months time you are releasing the rp server where people like cell can just go to town with text fighting and so and you're nerfing the server for the people who will leave for rp in a months time? That's just plain unfair.

[Crashlander04]

Gira, calm down - you're making us both look bad. However, the vote for yotta and cell's argument is only 3+ currently - so I don't know how fast anybody is going to be to make that change.

[yottabyte]

Yotta , clearly this idea is just complete crap. I mean seriously? On a server where tactical thinking is encouraged you decide to add something that is pretty game - changing just to make it a more casual experience for the people who don't want to think of ways to protect their crap? Or is this just you trying to 'outsmart' crash knowing you've both had heated arguments in the past?

No, I'm trying to make the server work for everyone and attract players to keep it active and thriving. Not having certain protection would quickly discourage a lot of the potential new players from joining/staying.

as cowards like you enjoy terrorizing new players.

And no, protecting cats from being hurt in towns isn't game-changing at all no matter what you might think.

[sammie287]

And no, protecting cats from being hurt in towns isn't game-changing at all no matter what you might think.

You won't be saying that when the kitty overlords take over kiwike and steal our diamonds X'D

[Cell]

Yotta , clearly this idea is just complete crap. I mean seriously? On a server where tactical thinking is encouraged you decide to add something that is pretty game - changing just to make it a more casual experience for the people who don't want to think of ways to protect their crap? Or is this just you trying to 'outsmart' crash knowing you've both had heated arguments in the past? If you want to protect luxuries why don't we just make chests invincible as well cause that probably falls under the equally dumb rule of 'dont be a dick' , seriously in a months time you are releasing the rp server where people like cell can just go to town with text fighting and so and you're nerfing the server for the people who will leave for rp in a months time? That's just plain unfair.

I am making a Suggestion, based on information I have, my play-style, and the play-style of the majority of the server, not just you.

And you, and your group of all people should be aware that I don't walk in towns to just "text fight".