Hello There, Guest!
Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
05-02-2012, 04:58,
Post: #41
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
(05-02-2012, 04:50)asdfasdflkjty911 Wrote:
(05-02-2012, 04:04)Ian25 Wrote:
(05-02-2012, 04:02)asdfasdflkjty911 Wrote:
(05-02-2012, 03:43)Ian25 Wrote:
(05-02-2012, 02:22)asdfasdflkjty911 Wrote: Get over it Garintina, a week isnt so long.

It'll feel like forever, but once its over it wont seem SO bad...

Lol jk its living hell.

Have fun!

I miss you man, it'll be far too easy to take over without you in the mix D:

Take what over? Ya'll aint takin over anything boi! See what you dont know, is that Android is actually me. And I have a vigorous inside plan to kill you all! Muwahahaha!

aww great, so now droid dupes as well as abuses?!? we're fucked!

Hey now, I didnt dupe and abuse, I abused a dupe. Totes diff. All one thing, not multiple. Only one. Not two. Silly Ian.

Eer sorry... BACK TO YOU ORANGES!

I meant, you duped, and droid abuses LOL but yes, back to oranges!
05-02-2012, 05:19,
Post: #42
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
Ohhh.. Yo comprendo..

Troll



05-02-2012, 08:46, (This post was last modified: 05-02-2012, 08:52 by smellityet.)
Post: #43
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
(05-01-2012, 23:02)oranges44 Wrote: now we are being punished for something we are not even sure of.


I read this, and I believe I have found your answer:
(05-01-2012, 23:14)yottabyte Wrote: You guys are turning Kiwike into your own little PvP fest. I have never seen any character interactions, lore or something similar coming from you, NLewis or Pwol, and I doubt there has been much. I don't really see what you're planning to do with your characters at all.

...so you perhaps would turn to other, more peaceful activities that don't upset other players. It seems like that reasoning didn't really work though.


I hate to say it, but I'm somewhat biased against you too, Giratina. Well, it's not really your fault you stabbed me to death with a diamond sword my first day here on this wonderful server.

Anywho, I suppose the problem is that barbaric parties seem to become too powerful and turn into playground bullies. Towns simply aren't given enough time in between these "attacks." I noticed that some players assert that helpless citizens will go out a few minutes later into their "secret special chest" to get their better items. Although it may be true that some state their character is "out for riches," I'm not sure that applies to PVP farming players

Perhaps it's because Minecraft is somewhat PVP oriented with the swords and potions. I am unsure.

---------------------------------------
(05-01-2012, 23:35)Crashlander04 Wrote: If bowser was truly aware of the restrictions, he would have simply asked about what he was doing there OOC, instead of trying to provoke him further.
(05-01-2012, 23:52)Pwol Wrote: If Bowser doesn't like being raided a few times a day then he should strive to make peace, or fight back.

If Giratina were requesting permission to attack, well then already heading off in that location without approval would be initiating the attack. You cannot expect to run up to city gates and then ask the mods for permission to attack the city when you've technically already begun to do so. So that, in my opinion, has broken the rule.

If Giratina is already incoming, then it implies that he had the approval. RP wise, the people in the city (bowser) aren't just going to stand there and question him. We all know those barbarians are brutal (No offense intended, RP reference). Whether you have permission or not, archers are going to shoot down on you and men will pour oil on any invading force. As Pwol mentioned, Bowser is "fighting back," which is clearly what he did.

It makes much better sense to leave your base and set off after being given permission. Otherwise, you're saying to any sentinel that you're attacking, which do don't even have permission yet to do.

EDIT: ^This paragraph is a bit confusing. Hang on, I'll try to revise it.
05-02-2012, 09:42,
Post: #44
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
Thanks Yonny. You put everything out on the table and backed up your claims. I think the mos have made the right call.
05-02-2012, 14:19,
Post: #45
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
***Tristo looks upon smellityet's post and frowns. He picks up the sword of the Biased Breaker and slashes smellityet in the chest removing all biased from the land once more. Giratina156 once more can see a way to freedom.***

[Image: kLeN8.png]
05-02-2012, 15:28,
Post: #46
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
Can we just think about the ban?

Giratina is being ban for raiding a town, which others are not being ban for.

The rule on Solitude is we have to ask permission to raid before doing so to make sure we RP reasons.

Well, Giratina had RP reasons for this raid, and even asked a mod to raid, but the mods responded with "Let me check".

So the only reason Giratina is being ban is because the mods did not get back to him to tell him he could raid.

I thought the purpose of this Rule is to make sure we RP. Well we are, he just forgot to get permission. I don't see how this is worth a one week ban.
05-02-2012, 15:33,
Post: #47
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
There's this overwhelming idea that we're hiding behind mods instead of fighting back. That is not true. We're fighting back through raiding, and through fist fighting instead of using swords we don't have

(05-02-2012, 15:28)NLewis Wrote: Can we just think about the ban?

Giratina is being ban for raiding a town, which others are not being ban for.

The rule on Solitude is we have to ask permission to raid before doing so to make sure we RP reasons.

Well, Giratina had RP reasons for this raid, and even asked a mod to raid, but the mods responded with "Let me check".

So the only reason Giratina is being ban is because the mods did not get back to him to tell him he could raid.

I thought the purpose of this Rule is to make sure we RP. Well we are, he just forgot to get permission. I don't see how this is worth a one week ban.
(05-01-2012, 23:14)yottabyte Wrote: Party never said something close to that. He never even hinted on a yes, yet you were at bowser's town almost immediately. 

Can someone get a log of this exchange? This is the real issue here. If Party said something along the lines of yes, then shorten the ban. But, if that was never said, keep the ban where it is.


And, yea, you guys have this ban because you DON'T RP. I hadn't RP'd with Giratina until the most recent peace talks, and I've only RP'd with Pwolbart and NLewis during peace talks. Outside of that it's just been flat killing.

Leech: Moderating the wiki for over 75 years
[Image: QZj44.gif]
05-02-2012, 15:48,
Post: #48
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
I have never seen ANY RP between us and pwol/Nlewis besides our previous peace agreement, of which at the time they broke because someone had "shiny armor". I heard they backed out of SC. And now what? They're gonna continue to betray and nonrp.



05-02-2012, 15:50,
Post: #49
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
(05-02-2012, 15:48)asdfasdflkjty911 Wrote: I have never seen ANY RP between us and pwol/Nlewis besides our previous peace agreement, of which at the time they broke because someone had "shiny armor". I heard they backed out of SC. And now what? They're gonna continue to betray and nonrp.

hard to back out of something that collapsed

Leech: Moderating the wiki for over 75 years
[Image: QZj44.gif]
05-02-2012, 15:52,
Post: #50
RE: Oranges44's Ban Appeal (2)
(05-02-2012, 15:48)asdfasdflkjty911 Wrote: I have never seen ANY RP between us and pwol/Nlewis besides our previous peace agreement, of which at the time they broke because someone had "shiny armor". I heard they backed out of SC. And now what? They're gonna continue to betray and nonrp.

Nlewis and Pwol are about the only ones that didn't back out of the SC.


[Image: 1fhaqh.png]




Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)